Sidereal and Tropical, each for their intended use! More Info Here.

Mt. Meru is the Equator!

Written on

by

Śuka describes Meru as a “mountain” – giri. This word literally means “something worthy of song,” i.e. “something noteworthy.” Hence, Śuka’s phrase, “foremost of all mountains” (kula-giri-rājaḥ) also means, “the most noteworthy entity.” So he is identifying Meru as the most important part of Ilāvṛta’s geography. It makes sense that he would describe it first.

The word he uses for “foremost” (rāja) also means “brightest.” Thus he is also saying that Meru is noteworthy because of how bright it is. He also describes Meru as sarvataḥ sauvarṇaḥ. This means “entirely golden,” but also means “always shining.”

The word Meru itself means “central.” For example, meru-daṇḍa refers to the spine, meru-cetā to the spinal cord, and meru-tarala to spinal fluid.

If Meru is indeed a mountain of gold, Śuka’s description of it seems crazy. For example, he says Meru is, “at the center of the world” (abhyantara-varṣaṁ). Mountains are on the surface of the Earth, not at the center. He says it, “permeates the entire extent of our world” (dvīpāyāma-samunnāhaḥ). There is no known mountain as tall as the Earth is wide, and if such a thing existed it should not be hard to find – especially if it is made of solid gold! He says it, “creates the center of our lotus-like world” (karṇikā-bhūtaḥ kuvalaya-kamalasya). Mountains don’t define the center of the Earth. He says “it produces a huge dome as it’s peak” (mūrdhani dvā-triṁśat sahasra-yojana-vitataḥ). Mountains have narrow, pointed peaks, not domes that are vastly larger than their base. He says “it encircles through the center of our world” (āntar-bhūmyāṁ praviṣṭaḥ). Moutains don’t do this.

Is Śuka and his Purāṇa crazy? I don’t think so. We just need to make the effort to carefully figure out what he is really talking about. 

Let us take Śuka exactly at his word. This is what he says about Meru:

  • It is the most important thing defining the structure of Earth. (kula-giri-rājaḥ)
  • It is most consistantly bright place on Earth. (sarvataḥ sauvarṇaḥ)
  • It is the center upon which the Earth is based. (nābhyām avasthitaḥ, karṇikā-bhūtaḥ)
  • It defines the center of the Earth by encircling it. (abhyantara-varṣaṁ, āntar-bhūmyāṁ praviṣṭaḥ)
  • It defines the spherical surface of the Earth by extending into a dome at its furthest point from its root at the Earth’s center. (mūrdhani dvā-triṁśat sahasra-yojana-vitato mūle ṣoḍaśa-sahasraṁ tāvat āntar-bhūmyāṁ)

There is a very well-known geographical entity that matches this description: The Equator.

Thus, rather than thinking of Meru as an upside down mountain of solid gold, the size of the Earth, right in the midle of a flat earth – let us take an even more literally faithful interpretation and think of it as the center of the earth, around which the earth is built, and which manifests geographically as the equator.

See Bhāgavatam 5.16.7

Tags

8 responses to “Mt. Meru is the Equator!”

  1. magdaalena37 Avatar

    Nobody, as far as I know, can give so complete and exact descriptions/translations as you do. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Frances Zammit Avatar
    Frances Zammit

    …sounds to me like what is being described is that place in the left (ventricular?) of our hearts … that centre which, in the Egyptian tradition, is Described as being weighed in the scales against a feather…. and which is in the area of our heart that regulates blood flow according to how we are living out our ‘karma’ and ‘dharma’ ….(excuse my vocabulary… I’m not conversant with the exactness…. I think the meaning is clear…) …(the Heart obviously not being a pump…but a regulator…regulating according to as we live…. (…how could the blood in our toes possible be ‘pumped’ back to our hearts…..!) …..and the ‘power’ from each of our Hearts extends …. I would say, to the distances described…. and the apparently ‘material’ Earth being representative of our apparently physical bodies being, apparently, turned inside out…? (By the way….. have you ever thought that your Dad may have been mistaken….?)

    Like

    1. Vic DiCara Avatar
      Vic DiCara

      The context of the discussion is cosmological.

      Like

      1. Frances Zammit Avatar
        Frances Zammit

        …yes, absolutely….that’s why I commented…(?)

        Like

  3. Frances Avatar
    Frances

    …..hi Vic, in case you are misunderstanding what I am saying…why cosmological…..this, methinks explains……. https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/PlanSphere/PlnSph_index.html ‘Planetary Spheres and their Influence on Mans life on Earth and in the Spiritual Worlds’……

    Like

    1. Vic DiCara Avatar
      Vic DiCara

      Everyone should develop their own understanding. But by submitting a comment to me it suggests I should reply and that you want me reply. My reply is that we have enough to learn. We don’t have to invent more or make it fancier. It is already fancier than we understand. We should try to understand superior teachers exactly as they guide us, not assuming hidden meaning unless they tell us to. Parikshit asked ashika to explain the physical world. Shuka is now explaining the physical world. We, the students, must listen carefully. We must fully grasp his understanding and description of the physical world BEFORE we try to bring his words to different levels and venues.

      Please try to understand this is my permanent mood. It is my attitude toward shastra. It will never change so long as I live. Please understand you are giving comments to such a simple minded person. As that.

      Like

      1. Frances Zammit Avatar
        Frances Zammit

        ….thank you Vic for explaining your position. I appreciate it….but now that Kali Yuga is over…we needed a little more guidance on the least painful way of moving on… it was Rudolf Steiner’s task to give us that guidance, in terms that the exiting Kali Yuga mind would understand…. so really it’s just a bit of an update…. in the context of leaving Kali Yuga behind… it having achieved it’s purpose…..nothing inconsistent methinks….. except that now, that which was needed during Kali Yuga is, ….well ….not exactly superseded…. more like …transcended and included…. (As Ken Wilber would say….) warm wishes Frances….

        Like

      2. Vic DiCara Avatar
        Vic DiCara

        I am posting this just so readers can see that I do not agree “kali Yuga is over.” Readers please see https://youtu.be/PJ94Gcyyenk

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Frances Cancel reply