Yama and niyama for a yogi is yama and niyama for a yogi. Why should you ask a non-yogi to live by those standards???
What is “right” and “wrong” depends on many things. Therefore the vedas never make any claims of universal rights and wrongs. They always scope the rights and wrongs to individual classes and types of people.
Hunting is dharma of a kṣatriya. More than hunting, a kṣatriya will probably kill other human men even. And that is their dharma. That is their “right” not their “wrong.”
Why is it? (A) it is an important part of martial training, and their duty requires proficiency in martial skills. (B) Animals can be a huge nusance to humans.
Kṣatriyas only hunted animals that were a nuisance or menace. It is easy to see how carnivorous animals would be a menace, but some herbivores are an agricultural menace. For example boar and deer.
Usually when kings get into trouble for hunting it is because they are going too far from human settlements, where these animals have the right to be, and the kṣatriya is overstepping their bounds hunting them there. Often a Rakṣasa will intervene to cause trouble for the hunter.
Now, about meat eating, again, you are trying to make a universal right and wrong, when right and wrong is a relative judgement. If one wants to be a sadhu, a yogi, a brahmin, if one wants to be an intellectual, and develop sympathy and love and kinship and peace – then it is wrong to eat meat. But not everyone is that type of person. Some people are warriors, some are just simple workers, etc. Meat eating is not wrong for everyone. Just look in Manu-smṛti. Manu says “there is no wrong in eating meat, but there is great merit in not eating it.”
So, if I have to kill boars and deer as part of my job, what should I do with the meat? Let it rot? No, I should eat it. This is why most Kṣatriyas eat meat.
Leave a reply to avacascade Cancel reply